What statuses should a social media approval process use?
Start with Draft, Ready for review, Changes requested, Approved, Scheduled, and Published. Use Blocked for an external dependency and Failed for a publishing exception.
Free approval template
Turn a scattered review process into a visible queue. The template defines who creates, who reviews, what must be checked, when the decision is due, and who confirms the final result.
CSV for Google Sheets or Excel. No email required.
Search intent covered
social media approval process template
Use a small set of states with one owner at each step. Every transition should name the person responsible and the due time.
Creator verifies the brief, platform format, links, rights, spelling, and account.
Reviewer either approves or requests a concrete change with a new deadline.
Publisher verifies the final account and time, then records the live URL or exception.
Routine evergreen posts should not wait on a large committee. Add legal, compliance, or subject-matter review only for claims, regulated topics, sensitive events, contests, rights questions, or high-impact campaigns.
A failed publish is not the same as a rejected draft. Preserve the approved copy, record the technical issue, assign a repair owner, and keep the retry visible.
Frequently asked questions
Start with Draft, Ready for review, Changes requested, Approved, Scheduled, and Published. Use Blocked for an external dependency and Failed for a publishing exception.
Use one accountable approver for routine work. Add specialists only when the post's risk or subject matter requires them.
Yes. Give the client a filtered view with the content, due date, decision, and notes fields they need.
PostTempo can move the workflow into connected planning, approval, scheduling, and status views when the spreadsheet becomes too manual.
Try PostTempo's free best-time planner, then compare the publishing workflow with your actual accounts and reviewers.
Build my free schedule